Danyal Sarfraz

The notion that homework is beneficial for students is heavily flawed. The reason being that homework is the cause of many issues rather than being beneficial. The earliest records of American schooling did not have problems regarding any overburden of homework on students, but as the system evolved children in lower grade levels were expected to complete more homework so that it would prepare them for higher levels of education. This eventually transitioned into all grades, but in the early 1900’s the rage was directed in favor of elementary school students. This resulted in a public outcry from parents and critics alike. Authors Gill B.P. and Schlossman S.L. provide insight on the matter, “During the 1930’s, many of homework’s critics began to define the health issue more broadly, charging that homework threatened children’s health by depriving them of outdoor play that was essential to healthy development” (“Villain or”, 2004). Critics, social scientists and researchers alike, complained that homework “constituted a health hazard”. Health professionals also agreed that the excessive amounts of homework given to children threatened their development because homework directly resulted in limited time. They agreed that because of the limited time students had for other activities they were imprisoned by school and consequently had their social skills harmed at a young age. Ultimately, the establishment of homework in schools has proven to be detrimental to students even as far back as the early 1900’s. Considering the fact that America still uses the same schooling system, which drew this criticism, it is not asinine to assume that the system is more than likely outdated for today’s highly advanced society and is need of serious reform.

 

Schoolwork, ranging from essays to projects, is generally time-consuming. Joseph Simplicio, an American author, advocates against homework in modern schooling. In his scholarly journal, “Homework in the 21st century”, he writes, “Successfully completing these time-consuming assignments on schedule they argue, leave children frantically attempting to balance overcrowded schedule that include schoolwork, homework, extracurricular activities, private enrichment lessons, sports, work, family, personal obligations, and much more” (2005). Simplicio is contrasting the two choices students have when faced with the task to prioritize school or their personal life. He is implying that those who dedicate their time to school have limited personal lives because their lifestyle usually ends up isolating them from the outside world, just so that they can focus on maintaining their grades. By doing so, students would be depriving themselves of the privileges like an afterschool job, healthy extracurricular activities, family time, and time for other various recreational activities. Those who wish to have a free lifestyle tend to not pay much attention to school and therefore procrastinate or simply do not do their assignments. It is common for teenagers to want time for themselves, it is their time to venture out in the world, learn their purpose and to finally mature themselves on their existence. Imposing upon the valuable time teenagers require to grow could be considered unethical if one considers it to be true.

 

Truth be told, excessive and unnecessary work for anyone is harmful. Likewise, students should not be expected to complete packets upon packets of schoolwork and still be obligated to come the next day and be at their best. Many students suffer from sleep deprivation, simply because most homework is tedious and time-consuming. It should also be taken into account that many students would much rather do their own activities before starting homework, by the time one starts homework it could already be 10:00 pm. Swick and Jellinek write in their research paper, “…lack of sleep can interfere with the consolidation of learning. It also has powerful effects on working memory and reaction time, making both academic and athletic performance suffer” (“Adolescents and”, 2017). Students that regularly receive homework are prone to experiencing less sleep resulting in the loss of much-needed rest. The brain would not be fully functioning which would result in the lack of calibration as the brain would not be refreshed, consequently, the brain’s capacity and abilities to retain information would also be severely hindered. Considering that homework is “supposed” to help students remember the material learned in class, this study proves it to be more ironic than accurate. If it were meant to help students memorize class material then why would it also be responsible for a lower level of brain function among students who stay up all night trying to complete their homework?

 

Change can only occur if the ones that have authority are willing to make any change. The Department of Education of the United States has not done much to reform the outdated education system ever since the inception of the agency in 1867. The DOE has not shown any interest because the closest they have been at addressing the issue of homework is by pushing the publication of a 31-page brochure in 1998 that detailed how teachers should assign homework and its positive role in the academic success of students. The brochure, conveniently, is labeled, “Helping Your Students with Homework…A Guide for

Teachers” (1998). The concluding paragraph of this brochure reads, “Homework can bring together children, parents, and teachers in a common effort to improving student learning […]” (p.45, 1998). Something that I would like to digress with. Non-profit organizations such as End the Race, formed by parents, exist to disagree with this statement. The DOE is not taking this issue seriously as the parents are; the education system that has been breeding off the lives of students burdened under grades that will eventually determine their fate. The brochure further says that homework leads to academic success, and

that homework develops life skills. This would be a fact if those skills were being sleep deprived,

time stripped, and stressed. If the education system is as perfect as the DOE assumes with their

lack of reform, then there should be no reason for why the United States ranks 14th in the global

education rankings according to a study by Masters and More. In comparison, Finland, notorious

for insisting that homework is useless, ranks at 5th. Considerably higher than the United States and stands to disprove the notion that homework means success.

 

End The Race’s motto, “Race for Nothing”, suggests that the students are racing through loads of homework and assignments, and in the end, they will not learn anything from it. The problem here is that the work students are completing is useless. End The Race made leaps and bounds in order to catch the attention of lawmakers and federal authorities.  In 2011, End The Race launched a petition labeled, “Urge the National PTA: Support Healthy Homework Guidelines”. After amassing more than 10,000 signatures, the petition shut down due to “complications” that have not yet been revealed to the public. The organization is very committed to bringing awareness that they created a documentary film. The documentary, “Race to Nowhere”, explores the lives of students and presents anecdotes of parents and doctors. Unfortunately, the film is screened in a few selected schools across New York. Organizations like End The Race exist to prove that parents are actively fighting to prove that homework is harmful rather than beneficial for their children. However, these efforts have proven to be futile. Although there has been no fruit to the hard work, the fact that parents and educators have done this much is inspiring. Their work stands to prove that there is an active problem with homework’s implementation because loving parents would not waste their time fighting for something that did not exist. Their fight should remind us to also voice our opinion even if it is not guaranteed to change anything.

 

Vicky Abeles, the leader, and director of End The Race wrote an op-ed on Time Magazine about how homework is obviously harmful through first-hand accounts with students she has worked with and also her own children. She starts her op-ed off with a line targetted at mothers in order to hook them in, “Would it surprise you to learn that some elementary school kids have workweeks comparable to adults’ schedules?”. This hook is powerful because of the absurd juxtaposition with this sentence. It would be insane to compare an adults work schedule with an elementary student’s but Abeles has evidence to prove it. She says, “For most children. Mandatory homework assignments push their workweek far beyond the school day and deep into what any other laborers would consider overtime”. Again with the juxtaposition, Abeles makes sure to make asinine comparisons in order to prove a point.  Her point is that students are made to do too much. Her argument starts from elementary students to show the worst of the situations and then she gradually moves on to older students, “With my youngest child just months away from finishing high school, I’m remembering all the needless misery and missed opportunities all three of my kids suffered because of their endless assignments”. Abeles continuously uses anecdotal evidence to win over the audience in order to make a point. Abeles further states, “I would urge them into bed before midnight and then find them clandestinely studying under the covers with a flashlight”. This sentence clearly proves the fact that homework is extremely time consuming. And in her own words because of the extreme homework her son is,  “finding little time for the exercise and fresh air essential to his well-being”.

 

Gifted Child Today, an educational popular source magazine geared towards professionals and parents, has voiced its concern over the homework argument many times. Once such example is in their Fall 2007 issue which is titled, “The debate about homework”. The text states, “Homework is given to students to do outside of the school hours. Since 1940, arguments for and against homework have surfaced in editorials, magazines, and peer-reviewed journals”. This introductory line provides us with some important context, the context that homework has been a controversial topic. With this precursor, it can be assumed that there is some weight within the anti-homework sentiment if it has managed to stay alive for so long.   The article seems to hold no argument but instead provides views from both sides of the debate in order to create space for the reader to decide. It is an informative piece rather than being an argumentative piece. It has no bias and is strictly was written to provide information for the masses. The article does refer to another popular source, “Educational Learning”. This magazine, just like Gifted Child Today, is also an educational magazine which caters to professionals and parents. It is apparent that Gifted Child Today sourced information from Educational Learning’s article which is titled, “The case for and against homework”. This article is divided between their argument which is that homework is being utilized incorrectly and a counter-argument to that statement, a tad different than Gifted Child Today’s article which had no statement. The first few words read, “Teachers should not abandon homework. Instead, they should improve instructional quality”. From the beginning, the article provides a statement which is further expanded upon. This article, labeled “Special Topic” was written by Robert J. Marzano and Debra J. Pickering in March of 2007. The article starts with, “Arguments against homework are becoming louder and more popular, as evidenced by several recent books…”. With this fact, the article delves into the case against homework, “The End of Homework: How Homework Disrupts Families by Kralovec and Buell…considered by many to be the first high-profile attack on homework, asserted that homework contributes to a corporate-style, competitive U.S. culture that overvalues work to the detriment of personal and familial well-being”. I believe this to be true because numbers and GPA’s are valued more than the student’s ability and drive to succeed, Instead of valuing the student’s vision and dreams, we value numbers on a paper by assigning countless assignments with varying lengths and difficulties and therefore stress and strain the student of their energy in order to determine their fate. The time homework consumes can directly relate to reduced family activity and could also very likely hurt the physical and emotional wellbeing of students who tend to take more time to do their homework than others. The article references another book, “A similar call for action came from Bennett and Kalish (2006) in The Case Against Homework: How Homework Is Hurting Our Children and What We Can Do About It. These authors criticized both the quantity and quality of homework…too much homework harms students’ health and family time…asserted that teachers are not well trained in how to assign homework…suggested that individuals and parent groups should insist that teachers reduce the amount of homework, design more valuable assignments, and avoid homework altogether over breaks and holidays”. Bennet and Kalish believe that students would benefit from quality homework in limited amounts, instead of lots of homework. Instead of giving homework consistently, teachers should learn how to effectively assign homework and refrain from giving poorly written homework and to also refrain from giving homework over holidays in order to allow students to spend times with their families without any worry of schoolwork. I am in complete agreement with Bennet and Kalish because in order to learn the work should be of quality rather than of quantity. Learning should be a desire and should not be forced, because if forced it will not work. This is evident by the number of students that drop out early or simply do not care about school.

The Educational Learning article titled, “The case for and against homework”, provides counter-arguments to the stance that homework is unbeneficial. The subsection, “The Dangers of Ignoring the Research”, states, “Cooper and colleagues’ (2006) comparison of homework with no homework indicates that the average student in a class in which appropriate homework was assigned would score 23 percentile points higher on tests of the knowledge addressed in that class than the average student in a class in which homework was not assigned”. Basically, those who do receive homework score higher on assessments, quizzes, and tests compared to those who do not receive homework. “Perhaps the most important advantage of homework is that it can enhance achievement by extending learning beyond the school day. This characteristic is important because U.S. students spend much less time studying academic content than students in other countries do”. The article claims that homework is statistically important because American students are not required to study work as much as students that, for example, live in Japan or China. It is said that the homework given to us now is important for us because it supposedly enhances achievement outside of the school life. Although homework MAY provide enhancements and benefits, it does not mean it is not mentally and physically detrimental within the long run.

A study, called “Stanford research shows pitfalls of homework”, was conducted by Denise Pope from Stanford Graduate School of Education, her findings bear interesting results and counteract this counter-argument. The study was conducted on a group of students from select schools and the study revealed, “56 percent of the students considered homework a primary source of stress, according to the survey data. Forty-three percent viewed tests as a primary stressor, while 33 percent put the pressure to get good grades in that category. Less than 1 percent of the students said homework was not a stressor” (2014). The study reveals that students will most instantly presume that homework is their primary source of stress regardless of any other factors involved. Not only does this prove that homework can cause stress, but it also proves that students stress about homework over everything else in their lives and that it is the biggest enemy to their happiness. These findings by Denise Pope prove that homework is a great stress on students and that even though it could benefit them, it will come with side effects. These side effects include stress, depression, lack of time management, no recreational opportunities, no time with family, and sleep deprivation. In a private online discussion with Denise Pope, she recommends that removing homework would benefit students greatly. “Well- we would love to see more time for kids to play…many kids have almost no free time these days, and it takes a toll on the mentally and physically”. It is evident that homework creates problems for students according to her studies and subsequent statements, Denise Pope says students she works with call homework, “busy work”. (Denise Pope, personal communication, October 17, 2018).

Teachers themselves also know the harmful effects of homework. A study documented by Stephen D. Aloia in his scholarly article, “Teacher assessment of homework”, he states, “This study examined the perceptions of 247 teachers about the…harmful effects of homework on the students”. Aloia goes on to state, “In addition, they were asked to respond to eight questions about the efficacy of their homework…”.  Before getting into the results, Aloia makes sure to provide background information to the debate on homework. He states, “Current scholars, such as Cooper, (1989) and, Walberg, et al., (1985), contend that homework is related to academic achievement and it is important in our educational system. However, even Cooper notes that “There is no evidence that any amount of homework improves the academic performance”, of students. Therefore, as he further says, “there will always be a need for on-going research and assessment of homework practices across the continuum of schooling”. After providing both sides of the story on the debate of homework, Aloia jumps straight into the responses given by the teachers. “List three to five ways that homework is harmful to your students…”. The teachers voted in order, the results are from most voted to the least voted. The results are as following: frustration, stress, lack of family time, no play time, too much work, parent problems, lower grades for non-completion, and miscellaneous responses (these responses include health issues, emotional problems, and lack of time for other activities that are recreational). These responses are expected because it was known very well. These harmful effects are obvious yet homework is still administered, most of the time irresponsibly and for the sake of giving homework out. It is true that school boards mandate a certain amount of homework or else the teacher will be penalized. Therefore, effects like frustration, sleep deprivation and stress occur. Students simply cannot keep up with the unreasonable amount of homework they are given.

 

Homework and its burdening impacts have been a dilemma for a long time. Much has

been done to bring awareness to the problem, but it is neglected. Many parents and students have

been ignorant for far too long because they think the system works. The truth is that the system

does not work for the students. The DOE does not seem to be interested in change, but it is

necessary.

 

Bibliography (as of October 25th, 2018):

 

SCHOLARLY:

Gill, B. P., & Schlossman, S. L. (2004). Villain or savior? The American discourse on

homework, 1850-2003. Theory into Practice, 43(3), 174+. Retrieved from

http://go.galegroup.com/ps/i.do?p=AONE&sw=w&u=nysl_me_76_tele&v=2.1&it=r&id=GALE%7CA122163697&asid=96266a4a0a6a7a62c6691b95885cfe49

 

Simplicio, J. S. C. (2005). Homework in the 21st century: the antiquated and ineffectual

implementation of a time-honored educational strategy. Education, 126(1), 138+. retrieved from http://go.galegroup.com/ps/i.do?p=AONE&sw=w&u=nysl_me_76_tele&v=2.1&it=r&id=GALE%7CA136846799&asid=2ee6851336ba64af48a3a9c7c752558c

 

Swick, S. D., & Jellinek, M. S. (2017, June 1). Adolescents and sleep, or the lack thereof.

Pediatric News, 51(6), 11. Retrieved from

http://go.galegroup.com/ps/i.do?p=AONE&sw=w&u=nysl_me_76_tele&v=2.1&it=r&id=GALE%7CA497947890&asid=8d14c3b4c52ccf90ab95f769b53c3992

 

Aloia, Stephen D. “Teacher assessment of homework.” Academic Exchange Quarterly, Fall 2003, p. 71+. Academic OneFile, https://link.galegroup.com/apps/doc/A111848824/AONE?u=cuny_ccny&sid=AONE&xid=fb190beb. Accessed 14 Nov. 2018.

 

POPULAR:

Abeles, Vicki. “Why Homework Should Be Banned From Schools.” Time, Time, 14 Apr. 2017, time.com/4740297/homework-should-be-banned-from-schools/.

 

Ascd. “Special Topic / The Case For and Against Homework.” How Student Progress Monitoring Improves Instruction – Educational Leadership, Educational Learning, Mar. 2007, www.ascd.org/publications/educational-leadership/mar07/vol64/num06/The-Case-For-and-Against-Homework.aspx.

 

“The debate about homework.” Gifted Child Today, Fall 2007, p. 6+. Academic OneFile, https://link.galegroup.com/apps/doc/A170020751/AONE?u=cuny_ccny&sid=AONE&xid=54f146d7. Accessed 13 Nov. 2018.

 

OTHER:

Pope, D. (2016, April 16). Stanford research shows pitfalls of homework. Retrieved from

https://news.stanford.edu/2014/03/10/too-much-homework-031014/

(n.d.). Retrieved from http://www.master-and-more.eu/en/news-detail/news/top-40-

education-systems-in-the-world/

 

“Urge The National PTA: Support Healthy Homework Guidelines.” Change.org, Race to Nowhere, 2012, www.change.org/p/urge-the-national-pta-support-healthy-homework-guidelines.